Speedster SWFT105 Radeon RX 6400 Gaming Graphics Card with 4GB GDDR6, AMD RDNA 2 RX-64XL4SFG2

I've always preferred AMD CPU builds along with an Nvidia card and MSI board. After 5 systems with Nvidia, I took the bait and switch over to an AMD card. It took a day to wrap my head around the Adrenaline Software and MSI Bios pairing, and I have to say< I'm extremely pleased with the build and this card. Along with a 9700x, MSI B850M -a PZ board, and 32Gb DDR5, this card slaps! The in-game quality is solid, the 16Gb is perfect, and the overall performance can only get better with overclocking. Stock, this scored a 98.7 in 3Dmark's Steel Nomad stress test. highly recommend. The fact I ordered this at 9pm and received it next day early PM is also a win.

So, I am an avid VR player. I love playing VRchat with friends, going to events with 60+ people there, and to say it's GPU intensive is an understatement. My NVIDIA 3060 Ti could not keep up, not with it's 8GB of VRAM, and the only option was either accept hindered visuals and not being able to see everyone's avatar at once...or upgrade. I chose upgrade. It was Black Friday, so all the sales were going on. The question was "Do I wait for the 5000 series by NVIDIA, buy a 4070 Ti Super which is being scalped right now, or do I decide to buy from AMD and take a leap of faith?" I chose to take the leap. AMD has a rough reputation with GPU's, driver issues galore, and they used to be very fickle about working properly. But in the day and age where to get 4080~4090 performance, you need to shell out $1,500 or more, right when a new chipset is also around the corner, there's a reason to look at the competition rather than the "name brand". AMD is not the off-brand parts component supplier it used to be, it is a fighting force, and it has product that rivals NVIDIA at lower prices. The Radeon 7900XTX with 24GB of GDDR6 VRAM absolutely blew my expectations. I need to preface, I did have issues initially. My build is older. I'll give a spec sheet at the end of this, but long story short, I can't overclock my GPU without Blue screening. That's more likely due to my system specs than anything else. But that first night, despite PC crashes, I was capable of loading all 80 players with very poor optimization that VRchat has, while also using Full Body Tracking which also taxes GPU's, and it still had more fight in it. My 3060Ti would have been incapable of even running at 10 FPS, where it was running smoothly at 27~35 FPS with everything I could possibly throw at it to hinder my FPS, and just going to any room with less people instantly got me right back up to 45+ FPS. While it may not seem impressive, with my build, it shows this is putting in incredible work. It never even was using more than 60% of the GPU's utilization, which is either due to my build bottlenecking it, or the game itself. The incredible part of this GPU is that with that much VRAM, you can throw so much at games graphically, that you almost don't even need to worry about it. Almost no games currently run you so close to the limit of your VRAM capacity, unlike with the 3060Ti with only 8GB's of VRAM, where it was a constant limiting factor. Still functional, still can handle VR even, but with hinderances. I feel unhindered with this GPU, and with the black friday sale getting it down to $799.99? It was a steal. Expensive, most expensive computer component I've ever spent, but it was worth every penny. I will go ahead and say, if you have been running small(er) graphics cards like the 3060, you may find you cant fit this GPU in your case. You should double check it can fit before you put it in. Even with my current case I bought, it has enough room, but it's a closer fit. It's big. It's monstrous what it can do. I'm limited by everything else, and I think when I upgrade more, I'll see just how much it's capable of. If you can't or don't want to afford an NVIDIA GPU equivalent between a 4080 and 4090, this is a great card to get. Powerful, enough VRAM that games will take time to catch up with this much VRAM being normal in most computers for years, and I see no reason this GPU won't last me another 3 years easily if not longer. If it's on a substantial sale, or in a year or two you can buy one second hand working well, it's a great option. Even for VR. Drivers aren't bad, they aren't NVIDIA, but they are still responsive about getting them out. AMD is truly a competitor and worth looking into even their GPU's, which for years couldn't be trusted. If anything, while they have that reputation, you should capitalize on the bargain if Intel's new budget offering isn't to your liking. Spec Sheet: MSI Tomahawk B350 AMD Ryzen 7 5800X AMD Radeon 7900XTX EVGA GQ Gold 1000 Watt PSU 32GB DDR4 RAM (Sorry I don't remember specifics on the RAM sticks.) It performs well despite an older CPU and even older Motherboard, and seen 2 different upgrades. Ryzen 5 3600 and NVIDIA 2070 Super to the Ryzen 7 5800X and 3060 Ti, to my current. It performs well for all VR tasks, with nearly if any issues. I run nearly every game on highest settings at 1440p, and desktop games run at stable 60+ FPS, usually higher almost always. It's a fantastic setup that really, I expect can coast me by for a good few years, I may invest more in the motherboard and CPU, go up to DDR5, but really, I'm not hindered by much with my system for my applications I play. This GPU has made a substantial difference, the previous was good, this is another ballpark. This was and is the first PC component I bought and felt excited to see installed, and am still so enthralled with it. I have some deep pride for my AMD 7900XTX.

The performance on this thing is really amazing when compared to the 5080, especially given the price difference. My 5080 was an Asus TUF OC edition, which ran about $1400. I returned it for this, and honestly I don’t miss it at all. I get great frame rates in all my games, amazing graphics quality, etc. all for half the price. It has enough power for running AI models locally as well, and while not as performant as CUDA, AMD has come a long way. I do notice a small difference in certain games on max settings, where the 5080 rendered the scenes with more vibrant colors and better lighting. However, it is nothing major and certainly not worth double the price. I just wish they would implement the single cable 12VHPWR power connector for this thing instead of requiring 3 PCIe 8 pin inputs. Check your PSU before you buy! I ended up having to get an adapter so that I could get 2 8 pin inputs from the 12VHPWR connector on my PSU, since I didn’t have enough 8 pin power connectors free. I think AMD may have beaten Nvidia here, unless you need CUDA or Nvenc for development specific tasks. Great GPU!

I’ve been running the XFX Mercury RX 9070 XT OC Gaming Edition in my new Ryzen 9 9800X3D build for two months now. The card runs flawlessly on factory settings (no manual overclocking), delivering stable, high-end performance across modern titles. Thermals are excellent. Idle temps stay under 40°C, and even in Cyberpunk 2077 (Ultra settings, FSR 3 enabled), it stays around 60°C. The triple-fan cooler and massive heatsink from XFX do serious work here—quiet, efficient, and cool under pressure. The ARGB is clean, syncs easily, and doesn’t require any bloated software. Build quality is solid—this is a beefy card with real thermal headroom and a sturdy feel. It fits well into a high-performance build and doesn’t feel like it’s cutting corners. That said, the price is a real drawback. The MSRP for a standard RX 9070 XT is $599.99, but this OC version comes in at $899.99. That’s a $300 markup for a factory OC, bigger cooler, and RGB. On top of that, I bought through a third-party seller and paid an extra $60 shipping due to demand. While performance is roughly on par with the 5070 Ti, the value just doesn’t hold up at that price point. For contrast, I also picked up an RX 9060 XT (3-fan version) for my 2018 Intel system, upgrading from a GTX 1080. That only cost me $50 over its $349.99 MSRP—and honestly, it felt like a far better value for mid-tier 1440p gaming. Cool, quiet, and perfectly matched for that older rig. And yeah, I now regret skipping the RX 7900 XTX. Back in 2024, it dropped to $799—$200 below its official $999 MSRP. Now, in 2025, it’s floating around $1,200 due to limited supply and rising demand. For what I paid for this 9070 XT OC, I could’ve had a 7900 XTX with better raw performance and more VRAM—and still come out ahead. Sure, I’d be giving up FSR 4 support—but let’s be honest, most current games still run on FSR 3, so I’m probably not missing much. The real loss is just timing. Could’ve had flagship-tier raster performance for less money. That one hurts. At this point, I’m planning to hold out for the 9080 XT/X or 9090 XT/X, once RDNA 5 has matured and pricing normalizes. Maybe around 2027, when the dust settles and the early-adopter tax fades, I’ll make the next big jump. Bottom line: The XFX 9070 XT OC is a strong GPU—cool, stable, and well-built—but its $899.99 price tag drags it down. It pairs well with high-end CPUs like the 9800X3D and delivers smooth gaming out of the box, but performance-per-dollar just doesn’t stack up. If you can wait or catch a better deal, do it. I wish I had. That said, in the context of today’s market, it’s not the worst deal. We’ve seen this trend grow since the “RTX tax” hit with the 2080 Ti—what used to be a $500 premium card in 2012 now easily breaks $1,000. If you're eyeing a 5080 or 5090? You’re looking at $2,000 to $3,000 easily. Against that backdrop, the 9070 XT OC’s $899 doesn’t look quite as insane—just mildly painful instead of laughably brutal.

Article reçu défectueux. J'ai du contacter un informaticien pour trouver la pièce défaillante qui faisait la panne.

Works great

La scheda é una scheda di fascia media, che permette di giocare a tutto in 1080p in dettagli che dipendono dal gioco che vuoi giocare, ma non sto dicendo che in giochi pesanti si deve giocare in dettagli bassi, ma che in giochi di nuova generazione come Hogwarts Legacy, l'ho testata e con mio stupore sono riuscito a raggiungere i 75 fps con quasi tutto elevato e con la tecnologia di fsr che permette di alleggerire il carico sulla GPU. Testata in giochi come fornite, gta V, valorant, Need for Speed heat, star wars jedy fallen order, inside, Little Nightmare. Andando a casa di un amico, con un PC con una 2060 Asus e un i5 10400f e 16gb di RAM singolo banco, ho avuto modo di fare una comparazione delle schede e con stupore ho visto che il mio ryzen 5 3600 e la mia 6500xt superavano le sue prestazioni del 20-25%, l'ho testata in fornite e gta giochi comuni e ho avuto modo di vedere che gli mancavano ben 30 fps su GTA v tutto elevato e 45-50 fps su fortnite in dettagli medi con DirectX 11. Quindi non ascoltate le recensioni di questa scheda su canali come prodigeek, o altri, perché anche i migliori possono sbagliare, io non sto dicendo che tutto quello che dicono é falso, ma che su questa scheda con i loro benchmark non hanno rispecchiato quello che la scheda é veramente in grado di fare e dare al gamer. Finché non provate una cosa non potete mai sapere come é realmente e io ne ho avuto la prova.

Hi end video card if you are focused on high definition AAA games

Molto soddisfatto, scheda che consuma sotto sforzo 260watt, ma riducendo la powersupply del 30%ed mettendo un undervolt si riesce a scendere a 175watt