Miller's Review of Critical Vaccine Studies: 400 Important Scientific Papers Summarized for Parents and Researchers

This book offers a wealth of information, breaking down 400 important scientific papers into summaries that are much easier to understand. Neil Z. Miller does a great job of compiling complex studies in a way that parents and researchers can actually use. I’m really glad I bought it when I did. It gave me a solid foundation to educate myself and feel more confident when making decisions about my family’s health. The summaries are clear and unbiased, making it a useful tool for anyone wanting to dig deeper into vaccine science. If you’re looking for a detailed, well-organized resource to get informed before making important health choices, this book is definitely worth considering.

Vaccines are safe and effective, right? Not according to the CDC’s own studies and not according to hundreds of other studies conducted around the world. Miller’s Review of Critical Vaccine Studies summarizes the findings of 400 vaccine-related scientific papers. Considered one by one, the findings are disturbing. For example: “Thimerosal-containing vaccines continue to be administered on a regular basis to potentially the most vulnerable populations: pregnant women and children (especially in developing countries). Given this, we believe it is high time to reassess the rationale for using thimerosal, a known immune and neurotoxic substance, in human vaccines.” (Tomljenovic Ll, Dorea JG, et al. Commentary: a link between mercury exposure, autism spectrum disorder, and other neurodevelopmental disorders: Implications for thimerosal-containing vaccines. Journal on Developmental Disabilities 2012; 18(1):34-42. “Evidence has now emerged showing that autism may in part result from early-life immune insults induced by environmental xenobiotics. One of the most common xenobiotic with immune-stimulating as well as neurotoxic properties to which infants under two years of age are routinely exposed worldwide is the aluminum vaccine adjuvant.” (Shaw CA, Sheth S, et al. Etiology of autism spectrum disorders: genes, environment, or both? OA Autism 2014 Jun 10; 2(2): 11. “The yearly U.S. mass influenza vaccination campaign has been ineffective in preventing influenza in vaccine recipients. Vaccine recipients need to be informed of the limitations and risks of the vaccine and of the alternatives to vaccination. In particular, they need to know of the possibility that repeated vaccinations may increase the risk of adverse effects.” (Geier DA, King PG, et al. Influenza vaccine: review of effectiveness of the U.S. immunization program, and policy considerations. Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons 2006 Fall; 11(3): 69-74.) “Under universal varicella vaccination, there has been a vaccine-induced decline in exogenous boosting. We estimate universal varicella vaccination has the impact of an additional 14.6 million herpes-zoster cases among adults aged under 50 years during a 50-year time span at a substantial cost burden of 4.1 billion U.S. dollars or 80 million U.S. dollars annually.” (Goldman GS. Cost-benefit analysis of universal varicella vaccination in the U.S. taking into account the closely related herpes-zoster epidemiology. Vaccine 2005 May 9; 23(25): 3349-55.) Most disturbing are the numerous studies cited in Miller’s book that expose the truth about pro-vaccine “science.” Following are a few examples: “Vaccine manufacturers have financial motives and public health officials have bureaucratic reasons that might lead them to sponsor research that concludes vaccines are safe.” (DeLong G. Conflicts of interest in vaccine safety research. Account Res 2012; 19(2): 65-88.) “For most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true. Moreover, for many current scientific fields, claimed research findings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias.” (Ioannidis JP. Why most published research findings are false. PloS Med 2005 Aug; 2(8): e124.) “The CDC’s image as an independent watchdog over the public health has given it enormous prestige, and its recommendations are occasionally enforced by law. Despite the agency’s disclaimer, the CDC does receive millions of dollars in industry gifts and funding, both directly and indirectly, and several recent CDC actions and recommendations have raised questions about the science it cites, the clinical guidelines it promotes, and the money it is taking.” (Lenzer J. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: protecting the private good? BMJ 2015 May 15; 350; h2362.) When considered as a whole, Miller’s Review of Critical Vaccine Studies exposes the people who shape the vaccine paradigm for what they are: self-serving criminals pumping out chemical cocktails based on fraudulent research operating within a liability-free industry/governmental relationship who are more than willing to injure or kill you and your children to maximize current and future profits. Whether you use Miller’s book to inform your vaccine-related decisions or to inform your legislators’ vaccine-related votes, Miller’s Review of Critical Vaccine Studies will serve as one of your most valuable resources. Brett Wilcox, author, We’re Monsanto: Feeding the World, Lie After Lie, Books 1 and 2

It must have been an enormous work for Miller by first to find and then read through reports and articles from which we here get their results. To me any chapters in the book were interesting to read, but among other “funny” to read the chapter 22, “Non-Vaccination by Doctors and Nurses”, where we realize that most of the persons who vaccinate other persons, and/or are highly educated, actually are those who is less interesting in being vaccinated, and especially not having their children vaccinated. By their working with vaccination, they have realized its backsides. Actually, before starting reading in this book, I just finished quite a bit of books about the vitamin D, and vitamin A, and among other how FDA and the medicine producers, way back in 1937, after a 9-year research results, which showed how fantastic healthy these 2 vitamins are making the users, how they, among other, tried to make selling illegal. For thereby by the producers to have made expensive drugs containing vitamins A and D, and to be sold by prescription. So, in the actual 2 chapters in the book, it was interesting again to read about these vitamins, and especially looking at reports result about the close connection between sun (vitamin D) and influenza, there on the side 263, about the 1918-1919 influenza pandemic, the Spanish disease, how the disease was more seldom in Texas than in New London. And on side 266 in a Norwegian report the conclusion that nearly all of the influence pneumonia only happening when in the winter getting no sun. So, vitamin D (D3 best) is the best protection against influenza. Interesting to know when now we are speculation about how to protect against the Covid-19. On the side 20 we read about how WHO, which for saving 15 cent per vaccine, uses a vaccine which contains the bad mercury. And at other sides we read about that the aluminum i vaccines can result in autism. On many of the pages in we read about the vaccination given to the newborn, or less than 2-year-old children, that is about chance for disease problems later in life. And in this case among other looked at the problem if the actual vaccines were taken later than told, for example in the first months after birth, or if not 4 vaccines were injected together, but separately, and the results showed that best if late and separately. And the reports also show that for vaccinated children, there have been more hospital health visit, than for the not vaccinated. And even this, more death among the vaccinated than the not vaccinated. Concerning possibly side problems as result of vaccination, it’s worst to read the chapter 9, about the vaccine for 9- to 26-year-old girls, against “Human Papillomavirus (HPV)”, which in 2006 was approved by FDA. In my eyes worst if we look at which diseases that the vaccine can result, actually: multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, paralysis, convulsion, chronic fatigue syndrome, anaphylaxis, pulmonary embolisms and dead. It’s not written in the book, but actually the vaccine has shown up to be less effective than pap screening by the Pap test. So why do FDA approve this vaccine, if it’s not for helping the producers? I will give side copies to doctors which I meet, and actually I would like to buy a copy to the doctor university library, to where I have given many books, but actually I don’t think that it would be allowed to be in the library. I have discovered too much about the doctor education politic, missing knowledge, here I Chiang Mai

My degree was in Biochemistry and a major option was in immunology. I do therefore have some understanding of the science behind vaccinations. Following vaccine damage to our son from the MMR vaccine, and also to my daughter from the DTP, and the subsequent extensive research I undertook, I completely reversed my previous pro-vaccine view. I used this book as part of my more recent research in deciding whether to allow our daughter to have any further vaccines including, MMR, only Measles and Rubella (privately) and tetanus (on its own privately) - and decided that for her, with her particular genetic make-up, the potential risks of MMR outweigh any potential benefits. Currently, I am not taking the other two options either. This book has been invaluable as part of my research but I would recommend anyone to not just rely on this. They should do their own research and read as widely as possible. I believe that it is deeply concerning that attempts are being made (evidenced by press reports) to shut down debate and hide relevant information from the public, preventing concerned parents from accessing scientific information that does not support vaccinations on the pretext that it is pseudo-scientific and dangerous - when precisely the opposite is true! We would not wish anyone to have to go through what we as a family have had to endure and I believe it should be a basic human right to have access to all relevant information which could have a major and significant impact on our childrens' futures and health. It is frightening to think that even newspapers and the media are terrified to publish any story that could be construed as being anti-vaccine as they would be accused of endangering public health. I know this to be true from a journalist we know. So much for a free press ! My hope is that science correspondents for papers will start taking the time and trouble to carry out some thorough research into this all important area without simply relying on vested interests for their information- only then will at least some unbiased information become more readily available to the general public.

This is a huge archive about scientific researches that show that vaccines are not what they say they are. Great job. Bought with Dissolving Illusions, this couple of books are perhaps the pillars to understand that good science survives despite of business interest and corruption. We have to save ourselves from this fraud.

Muy bien referenciado. Si quieres evidencias científicas o saber qué se ha estudiado sobre las vacunas y sus efectos secundarios este es el libro. Para mi ha sido decisivo.

Fakten über Fakten. Renommierte Studien als Überblick, mit einer Studie pro Seite, das wichtigste auf einen Blick. Hauptaussage und Quintessenz sowie alle Randbedingungen der jeweiligen Studie werden beschrieben. Wer mehr will, kann nach der jeweiligen Studie im Netz suchen und das komplette Paper lesen. Selbst wenn man überzeugt ist, von seiner Meinung, sollte man keine Angst haben, die Gegenseite zu hören, sonst ist man nämlich nicht überzeugt. Dieses Buch ist wissenschaftlich fundiert. Schade, dass in öffentlichen Diskussionen nur einseitig berichtet wird. Es wird immer geschrien, es gäbe von der impfkritischen Seite keine wissenschaftlichen Fakten. Wirklich? Hier wären über 400 Studien von verschiedenen Wissenschaftlern aus Universitäten auf der gesamten Welt. Warum zitiert die nicht mal jemand öffentlich? Sehr merkwürdig. Absolut lesenswert!!

Used for research into the history of vaccines and vaccine injuries.