The Ultimate Time Machine Kindle Edition

I read this book when it originally came out 20 years ago and wrote down a few of the major predictions. I monitored those over the years and every one of them came true within a few years of the suggested time. I had to buy it again as I lost that copy. I am not sure if this was updated or why it has a newer date on it but the prediction are the most accurate I have found of any such works. RV is real.

So l have read several books over the years since the turn of the century that have made an attempt at prediction. All failed for me. But I have a lot of respect for this author after reading his Stargate Chronicles, which was a brutally honest recounting of his years in the Army as an intelligence officer and remote viewer. Still, reading this book was a struggle, especially the predictions, which are, at best, 20-30% accurate (generously speaking). Perhaps it's more difficult to predict the future (as opposed to focusing on a particular subject as they do on a typical RV session).The reason why l still gave the book 3 stars is because the author is, l believe, a person of integrity and someone who deserves a lot of credit for his contribution to this extremely important (yet nascent) science (RV), which l believe can unlock many mysteries of existence. But we still have to remain honest. All of us, writer/teacher and reader/student!

Average book and a bit disappointing. Glad I got the Kindle version and didn't pay for a paper copy.I hope that the real future is of abundance, love, freedom, and respect.

This is my first Joseph McMoneagle book and I haven't ever been to the Monroe Institute. Overall I really enjoyed reading the book and the thoughts it stimulated in my mind. I can think of all kinds of questions I would like to ask the future such as when does artificial intellligence exceed human intelligence.About the last 2/3 of the book are actual predictions devided up by category. I am pretty sure that a bunch of the predictions were probably made in late 80's and 90's. Now that they are being published in 2013, maybe 5-10% predictions are for years that have already taken place. It is hard to put a number on his accuracy. If he gets the incident right but the year wrong, is that a "hit" or a "miss?" If the author can "predict" 50% of the future is that amazing or is that horible? Is the glass half empty or half-full?On some subjects, you do see the author's military background show through. It is a very different thought pattern than many authors on books in the occult/spirituality/paranormal categories. It is a refreshing change. Overall I find his idea of using this kind of paranormal technology to try an usher in the future faster a very compelling and powerful idea. I hope it is used to bring humanity more quickly into the future (so that I can drive a flying car.)

Decent book on a fascinating subject. Seems a little dated though and it would be interesting to have a revised version comparing and contrasting in his own words what he outlines in this book versus what has actually happened.

It was written in 1998 and now it's 2020 and at least two thirds of the things foreseen for the time inbetween have come to pass and it's a very interesting and entertaining read. Thanks Joe!

I read this book aug 20th 2015. It was mostly written in 1997. As I read the predictions for now, I watched them unfold in real time which was fun but not important. What is important is recognizing the true nature of reality which this book helps uncover.

You can argue with credentials like this.

Truly superb book even though it could have been written better by the author. He is just filling in the pages with words that could have been more educational. But having said that it still has me begging with more questions.Super fast delivery thank you!

Don't be fooled by the publishing date of 2012... After reading through, it becomes clear that this material must have actually been published many years earlier. Certain things within it lead me to believe it's most likely to have been written at some point between the mid- to late-nineties.Aside from that, it's as you would expect. It's a book which focuses solely on data retrieved from the future via Remote Viewing techniques, as written by one of the leading figures involved in the US government's own programme of investigation. If you want a volume which deals with the debate over RV, itself and verification experiments, look elsewhere. That isn't the purpose of this and it doesn't claim to be.On the bright side, because time seems to have passed by since it was initially written, it's interesting to see how some odf the predictions panned out. Date-wise, it's a bit hit-and-miss, but that's the nature of the beast... Free will has to be taken into account and, assuming that RV is legitimate, one has to allow for time periods to be off. Actual events, however, are more interesting to note. In hindsight, you can see that some of the predictions for, say, the 2000s are more applicable for a later time. And, of course, there are a fair few instances of events which never took place and don't seem to be showing any sign of doing so, either!As a relatively cheap book, however, it's a useful overview of an RV professional's predicted timeline. Use it as a chronological yardstick and see for yourself how accurate the results had been.

As beforehand, deep, insightful,must compensate for spatial and temporal Dilation, brilliant for its own era. A number of observations exact, others not so.

This is an excellent example of RVthat makes good predictions of what *would* have been our future,except that we went & made unconscious-ignorance overrule those probabilities,& now are on a significantly different timeline.Interesting ideas, though!*Remember this work's success-rate when making predictions, eh?*Thank you, McMoneagle, for making this book to show us a way,& how scathed we would be if doing it ourselves,AND for showing us potentials most of us would never have thought of!( :

Utile la parte iniziale che descrive alcuni concetti generali sul Remote Viewing. Utilizza il proprio modo di intendere la realtà (background socio-culturale) per interpretare le visioni del passato e del futuro.