NRG Innovations NRG-FRP-330 Fiber Glass Fixed Back Bucket Racing Seat (Small), 4 pt Harness Compatibility, Black Seat Cover, 19"W X 18" D X 34" H

I originally bought the FRP-300 and found it a bit short in the torso and narrow in the shoulders so I bought two other seats in the NRG range that were listed taller and wider in the shoulders, the FRP-311 and the FRP-302. I found the NRG size chart isn't that accurate, or at the least, the dimensions they give don't reflect the dimensions inside the bucket. Below is what I measured vs what NRG lists (google their chart, amazon won't allow links)FRP-300: AccurateShoulder Width (column A in the NRG chart): 23" vs 23" measuredSeatback Height (column F): 34" vs 34" measuredSeatback Height in bucket: 32"Outer width at rear mounting bolts: 17" measuredSeatback Angle (no NRG column): 102 degreeFRP-302: Narrower than listed, slightly bigger than the FRP-300Shoulder Width (column A in the NRG chart): 24" vs 23.5" measuredSeatback Height (column F): 36" vs 34.5" measuredSeatback Height in bucket: 32.5"Outer width at rear mounting bolts: 17" measured (per NRG chart column D, implied it should have been wider than FRP-300)Seatback Angle (no NRG column): 102 degreeFRP-311: Closer to accurate fit didn't work for meShoulder Width (column A in the NRG chart): 24.5" vs 24.25" measuredSeatback Height (column F): 36" vs 36" measuredOuter width at rear mounting bolts: 16.5" measured (per NRG chart column D, implied it should have been same as FRP-300)Seatback Angle (no NRG column): 97 degreeSeat bracket and seatback angle note: Even with a lower rear and higher front position compared to the 300 or 302, the 311 is much more upright. Using the standard NRG supplied bracket, I measure that it 10 degrees more upright at highest front position lowest rear compared to the 300 and 302 at highest front and middle rear. You would need an aftermarket seat bracket to match the seat angle of the other two.Of the 3, I kept the Prisma FRP-302. While it wasn't much bigger than the FRP-300, the build quality felt better and I liked the looks better. The FRP-311 while taller and wider at the shoulders, was too upright for me, and had a very large front leg cushion that cut into my legs that i didn't like. The FRP-300 is slightly smaller than the FRP-302, but the fabric construction isn't as nice as the FRP-302.As far as value and availability, NRG is hard to beat and value is strong for whichever you pick. I felt the premium for the Prisma FRP-302 was worth it for the colourways and nicer fabrics.

I am 5' 10" (178cm) and around 210 lbs (95kg) with a 38" (96cm) waist and the "L" large/wide version fits me very well.It's great value that the seat comes with brackets for mounting, and while I'd be hesitant to put this in a real car, it's perfect for a sim rig. The "wings" don't push my shoulders in too much, and the cushion under the knees offers great support too. Another sim racing plus is that if you race in VR, the cord slides nicely along the fabric over the wings, so there's no snagging.It's also quite comfortable, but this is highly subjective; let's say the padding is sufficient and there are no hard spots or pressure points.It's worth noting that the photos for the listing show 3 different versions of the seat. I ordered "Black, Large" and the design I received was like the blue one.The black, large image shows what appears to be a headrest cushion; it's not there on my seat. The pattern of the fabric panels on the edges of the seat are different as well; it looks like the spacing of the seatbelt slots are wider too.The black, medium image shows fabric and panels that match what I received, but the seatbelt slots are different; much taller in this image.The blue image has panel shapes, seatbelt slots (narrow and angled), & headrest detail (embroidery) that matches what I received with my black, large order.It feels like a great value for the price range; it's sturdy & supportive.

Like the headline says, everything about the seat is fantastic, minus the lack of adjustability.There are 3 holes on the seat to mount the side mounts in different positions, but you can't mount them in the bottom 2 positions without the seat coming in contact with the side mount. And forget about even trying to put a bolt through the mount, as it will touch the seat immediately and you won't be able to get a nut on. Those positions are simply unusable, and should not have even been added to the seat.If you're using sliders with the seat it will not get low enough, especially being stuck with only having the highest hole position. So I had to remove sliders completely, and now I'm stuck in a position that makes me have to fully extend my legs to depress my clutch (I'm 6'1" btw), all because I wanted the seat to be low and the sliders remove that option.Long review short, if you're concerned about adjustability and having the lowest race seating position possible, these seats aren't for you. On the other hand, if you don't care about how low the seat gets and just want a relatively cheap, comfortable and good looking bucket seat for your car, I would definitely recommend you get these.