Exact Inkjet, Laser Print Index Paper

This paper is good quality given that it is 110# Index Weight. To help you understand the differences between the different weight scales, I've included a conversion chart that is very helpful. I usually buy 24# Bond Weight paper (90 grams per square meter) for daily printing use. This cardstock product is 110# Index Weight paper (199 grams per square meter) and is roughly twice the weight and thickness of my daily printer paper. It is a moderately thick cardstock. If you want a thicker and stiffer cardstock, you'll want to get one with higher weight. I would recommend getting 110# Cover Weight paper (297 grams per square meter) that is roughly three times the weight and thickness of my daily printing paper. It would be useful if all the paper vendors included a weight conversion chart in their product listing to clarify the differences.

This is the absolute thinnest "card stock" I've ever seen. Total waste of my $. The 80 lb stock I get from office depot is drastically thicker and heavier than this supposed 110lb stock. Picture shows 3 pieces of this glorified notebook paper bending under it's own weight

I bought this product with the understanding that it was 110lb paper. I used to work in a commercial office supply place, this is clearly not 110lb paper. Not to mention I also received the same day 105lb paper from another vendor. The 105lb was definitely a much stiffer paper, what I expected. I am pretty sure that someone messed something up. I don’t know what the 110 is supposed to represent on the label but it is not the weight of the paper. I added a photo of a chart I found online. 199g/m2 is the equivalent of 53lb paper. Not what I was looking for. It is definitely listed wrong. There are multiple places in the listing stating it is 110lb paper

I bought this card-stock to print out die cut images which were then to be cut using my cricut machine. I purchased this cardstock in particular because it said it was both inkjet and LASER JET compatible (actually said that it was guaranteed to work on both). However, after two test runs, ink smeared after touching the page even after letting air-dry for about 10 minutes. Since I opened the package, I am now stuck with this item.

This is the worst card stock I've ever tried!!! It is flimsy and will not die cut without tearing! The company, My Office Innovations, will not issue a refund because I "opened the package" and also used it"!? I used 1/2 sheet of the 100; how would I find out it was defective if I didn't open the package & try it?? They refuse to issue any part of the $15.66 I paid them for this defective product. Buyer beware.

I love this paper but my real complaint is due to the packaging. Product came completely in shambles. Both ends of the bag were torn and crumpling with the paper inside all over the place. Thankfully it wasn't enough damage to request a return but I'm definitely surprised it wasn't worse by the look of the bag.

Great paper. Used this to print adult coloring books and it worked fantastic. Nice thickness and color.

I ordered 110 pound cardstock, and even though the label says it's 110 pound, it is only slightly thicker than your standard copy paper. I am livid and will have to return it. It's an okay product if you want paper, but not okay if you want cardstock.

Second time I purchased this brand expecting 110 lb card stock for card making. I read and re-read the ad and saw "110 lb". And the last time I checked "lb" stands for pounds so why do I keep getting this flimsy stuff. I have 110 lb and it's card board for cards. I'm choked. Some buyers write this is advertised correctly saying its #110 BUT IS SAYS 110 lb in the ad as in 110 pounds - very misleading. I most certainly will not be buying this again and may not be buying any papers from Amazon to avoid this. Go to your local craft store, forget Amazon.

The price is great but this is definitely one of those things - you get what you pay for. Being relatively new to cutting machines and papercraft I thought, at first, this brand (have purchased 2 different weights) was pretty good. That is until I paid marginally more and bought some better-known brands. The difference was stunning. The Neenah has a very "unfinished" quality to its surface. In comparison, the other brands are considerably thicker (at the same weight) and have a much smoother finish. The 110lb paper has the same thickness as some 85lb paper I purchased from name brands. In my personal opinion, this paper is great for kids to draw on but for gifts and cards, I will definitely be buying a better quality paper.

This paper is as advertized 199 gsm EXACT INDEX cardstock which is the lower quality of Neenah paper if your looking for card base material then you need to look for COVER cardstock approx 297 gsm / 110 lb which is the higher end of Neenah known by many card makers as Classic Crest - This still works as a layering paper as it is just slightly lighter and the same colour as the Classic Crest Solar White 80 lb. Works for me..

The paper holds its form reasonably well. It fed through my HP laser printer without any jams. The paper is quite smooth in finish, but not shiny. It took the scanned colour image well.In other uses it will hold up to pencil crayon, pen and ink and line marker with limited fill in colouring without warping. Its not for watercolour or acrylics.The package arrived damaged, showing a bend on the corner affecting the first 20 or so sheets. They were still usable with a half inch trim after printing.

When this came, is was in a plastic bag in the box with a green label on it saying "ready to ship" The outer (yellow) package) was ripped apart at the top. When taking out, you could see hand through it in front of the light. Extremely light like magazine cover weight . Is lighter 11 gr per sheet to 12g per sheet from the lightest 60lb weight stock have bought, and claims to be 110 wt. Will be ok for using markers or pencil crayons, but for card stock, no. Did some get packaged wrong? In all my purchased, this last order was the only one with complaint about the product not being what was claimed. Sorry guys.