Ultra Performance Mens Lounge Pants 3 Pack Open Bottom Sweatpants for Men | 60% cotton 40% polyester jersey, deep pockets, pull-on waistband, wide leg fit, ideal for lounging and errands, jersey

They were a great buy.

Love them

Well made for price

The fit was good and the material is super soft and airy.

The colors were fine and the style, very simple, The longest inseam length in this style/brand is only 32"—a length way too short for tall men. Like almost all manufacturers of sweatsuits/sweatpants, bigger sizes mean wider, not longer garments. Tall, slender folks are out of luck, when it comes to size options. I requested a refund since none of the size options would be a fit for me.

Absolutely love these

PASS THESE OVER:THE PANTS RUN VERY VERY SMALL!!!Nice soft material, went to my petite wife instead, they are a very nice soft kinda double thick jersey type material. I would have lived these if the size was correct and great price point too.I ordered XL due to another reviewer stating sizes run small; wow that was a understatement. These are running a full 3 sizes small and on the short side.I normally wear a Large or even a Medium for sweat pants, sleep pants and similar. I couldn’t even put these on all the way, and f I did they would of fit like knickers at mid calf. I laid them out next to a pair of similar material sleep paints I have in Men’s Medium, these Men’s XL are even small that the Mediums and shorter legs too. So I then laid them out next to a pair of Nautica Men’s XL sleep/lounge pants I have that are a little bigger fitting than I would like, but had to take photo of a pair of these ‘Performance’ Men’s XL pants side by side to show the major sizing issue.It seam that these Men’s XL are likely women’s size and cut. My wife is positive they are women’s cut and she likes soft comfy lounge paints on the big size. She said “I’m keeping these” so Amazon got lucky, but my wife is literally half my size and just a little over 5’, verses I’m a few inches over 6’ and these pants would be going back otherwise as they are either Women’s, Youth, or sized for a different international market where individuals my size are not common (normal L to XL, standard N. American or European men’s sizing [I’m 6 ft +, 200 lb +] ). But I suspect she is right that they are woman’s sized labeled wrongly as men’s given the significantly smaller size, no fly, and no extra dace in the groin area of the cut.

I found these sweats to be tight around my legs. They said it was an open bottom but for the size, the legs do not offer enough room to move. When wearing socks with these sweats, the generate a fair amount of static, hold on to places they should not and do not allow easy removal. Open bottom? The ta[per from knee to ankle is enough to keep me from purchasing these ever again.Why the taper on open bottom legs that keep the bottoms from dropping to their normal position for us that have larger legs? I even bought the larger size thinking that would allow for more leg room. Maybe it's the material that causes static to hold things up and bunch where it is not needed or wanted.Either way, I would not recommend these sweat pants for any reason. Ultra performance? I don't think so. More like someone's idea of a designer look without the functionality.But after all, isn't that what designer clothes are all about? More the look and less functionality?Personally, I'd rather have the functionality first, then make them look good. Did I over star these sweats?