Attn: Grace Panty Liners for Women - 46 Liners – for Light Urinary Incontinence, Bladder Leakage or Postpartum - 100% Breathable & Plant-Based Materials Active Odor Control - Free from Harsh Chemicals

I have a lot of problems with chemicals and find these pads to be gentle on the skin and no problems with irritation. I have continued to keep buying them.

I purchased the Attn: Grace Panty Liners for Women - 46 Liners – for Light Urinary Incontinence, Bladder Leakage. I have been trying all the other bladder leak pads that are on the market because I am now at an age where I do have minor leaks. The ones that I’ve purchased previously are either too long too bulky, have perfumes and do not stay in place. I found these to adhere and stay in place. I also like that they are made with all hypoallergenic materials for those of us who have sensitivity issues with pads containing harsh chemicals. I have been wearing them now for a couple of days and they are just right for my needs they’re soft, comfortable, and sized just enough and gentle to wear every day for a bladder pad. They kept me fresh and comfortable all day and I didn’t notice that I was even wearing it. So, after purchasing so many others that just weren’t working for me, I have finally found my daily bladder pad. I love, love, love these pads. The price point is perfect with a package of 48 pads costing just $10, which is only a quarter a pad. I definitely recommend getting them.

Good absorbency. Very nice size. Not organic but gentle on the skin. I will order again. Sticks well to panties.

I bought these. They are nice, especially if you have to wear for leaks. Or wear longer before you can change them. I actually wanted the panty liners. Which I will buy them next. These are comfortable & does not irritate me, like other pads do. I love they are all natural. I took one star off, for the price & amount of pads. There should be a hundred pads, for that price.

Absorb well considering how small they are. Very comfy pad

The pads are wonderful, and I have tried many types. I have very sensitive skin and they do not bother me. The only problem I have is that Amazon ships in bags and my items arrive smashed up. Amazon, Please put these in boxes.

I have highly sensitive skin and most light bladder pads force me to discontinue due to rash/itching. These do not. They also have good adhesion and stay in place. I just received my second order. Very satisfied!

I was drawn to this product because the materials were identified as "cotton, bamboo." When the package arrived yesterday (and it was thoroughly crushed and ripped open inside the mailer bag) I was taken aback by a sticker that had been placed over the materials list identifying them as: Polyacrylate polymer Wood cellulose Polyester Thermoplastic polymer Polypropylene Polyethylene Plant-based polyethylene Calcium carbonate I peeled off the sticker and underneath it, it says: Ingredients Skin-safe, plant-based, renewably sourced polyethylene top sheet Sustainably forested, totally chlorine-free wood pulp (absorbent core) My guess is that some regulatory body (probably in California or the EU) decided the original list was to vague and airy-fairy and demanded more detail. (Who put the individual stickers on all those packages, I wonder??) I put the question to ChatGPT and here is its response in (almost) its entirety: Short answer: These liners are NOT primarily bamboo and cotton in the way most people would reasonably expect. Here’s why: The Amazon listing (“bamboo, cotton”) is marketing language, not a full materials disclosure. The original package text is still somewhat marketing-forward (e.g., “plant-based polyethylene”). The sticker is the most chemically explicit—and therefore the most honest/regulated version. And what does that sticker tell us? 👉 The product is mostly: Polyethylene / polypropylene / polyester → plastics Superabsorbent polymer (polyacrylate) → the gel used in diapers/pads Wood cellulose (pulp) → the absorbent fluff core That’s a very standard disposable liner construction. Where did the “bamboo” and “cotton” go? This is the key issue. “Wood cellulose” can come from trees… or bamboo. → So maybe some pulp is bamboo-derived, but it’s been chemically processed into pulp fiber. No cotton is explicitly listed anywhere in the actual materials. So: If cotton is present at all, it’s minor or part of a blend (and not important enough to list clearly). Or it may be absent entirely, despite the listing. 👉 In other words: “Bamboo/cotton” is being used loosely to signal “natural-ish,” not to describe the actual structure.

Love these. Just the right weight. No issues with unsticking, or worse, sticking to parts of me that would be uncomfortable. Wear them everyday, and never have to think about them from morning to evening. Just wish they were more easily available in Canada.