Condenser Microphone with Windscreen, Professional Cardioid Mic, XLR Gold-Plated Diaphragm Recording Microphone for Singing, Studio, Instrument, Interview, Radio Stations, Broadcast - CM-60

For the price paid, this is a really great microphone. I use it for recording my saxophone tracks to upload to my online saxophone studies. It picks up the sound really well on my recorder, and is a good value for the price paid.

Takstar builds high quality mics. The fit and finish is up there with top well-known brands. Here is a tip on mic placement for various sound profiles (distance apart from mic): 15–30 cm (6–12 in) – balanced clarity, warmth, and noise control. Distance guide: 10–15 cm (4–6 in): Warm, full, bass-heavy (proximity effect). More mouth noise and plosives. Best for intimate vocals (if articulation is controlled). 15–30 cm (6–12 in): Clear, present, minimal proximity effect and room noise. Ideal for most recordings (singing, podcasting, audiobooks, VO). 30–40 cm (12–16 in): More natural with slight room tone, but less clarity. Needs good acoustics. Best for treated rooms or spatial effects. >50 cm (>20 in): Thin, distant, echoey. Not recommended unless in a studio or for creative effect. Practical tips: Adjust distance dynamically: lean back (~12 in) for loud/high notes, move closer (~6 in) for soft whispers.

It's a good microphone for a low price. I recorded it at the same time while using a Neumann MCM 114 for acoustic guitar. The Neuman was a bit clearer but the Takstar surprisingly held its own. Not bad for a microphone that costs around $45 bucks compared to another that costs around $700 dollars. I highly recommend if you want to record good sounds and save some money.

I use this TAKSTAR model to record everything from solo instruments to full orchestras. While it is a relatively small diaphragm unit the signal to noise ratio has been excellent and it handles quite high SPLs with no distortion. The frequency response, as shown in its spec sheet, is almost ruler flat from 20 Hz to 17 kHz with a broad rise of approx. 4 dB around 10 kHz, ensuring a completely natural, uncolored sound. The cardioid pattern and frequency response uniformity is very good, allowing these to work very well in an ORTF configuration. I have a $600 coincident dual-capsule condenser microphone, but I've found the CM-63 to provide slightly more extended low end and similar high-end. These have become my favorites for general recording! The case is nicely machined and painted, and material quality is excellent. I recommend this model without reservation for most any field or studio recording.

So, I compared this to PGA-81. This sounds stuffy and doesn't seem to capture a lot of high end. I am going to use these for drum overheads so ... probably fine that they aren't great at picking up high frequency details. I wouldn't use this to record stringed instruments or anything.

I bought this with the intention of using it as a donor body and circuit for a microphone parts sdc capsule (which costs 5x what this entire microphone costs!). I have to say, when I tested this microphone out stock, I was actually very surprised by how good it sounded as is. With the capsule replacement, it rivals a Neumann km184, but even with the stock capsule I would still say this mic is worth every penny. It even comes with a dual 5/8 and 3/8 microphone clip! Never seen one of those before!

Great drum overhead

For being an inexpensive mic, it sounds great. I've been using it for home music recording and everything sounds clean and clear. No distorting of the sound. I'm very happy with this.

Bom produto. Devido a seu espectro de frequências, considero mais indicado para metais e alguns instrumentos percursivos. Foi adquirido para ser utilizado na capitação de hi-hat. Discordo do fabricante indicar a possibildade de uso para voz, prefiro o clássico SM57. De maneira geral atende ao uso o qual definiu sua aquisição.