Nikon Z50 + Z DX 16-50mm + Z DX 50-250mm Mirrorless Camera Kit (209-point Hybrid AF, High Speed Image Processing, 4K UHD Movies, High Resolution LCD Monitor) VOA050K002

Producto excelente, sin problemas

Being a professional, I have Full Frame (Nikon) APS-C (Nikon) and M4/3 (Olympus) systems, dedicated for different purposes. This Nikon Z50 APS-C combination hits a sweet spot in performance and mobility and - at its ridiculous price when purchased - astounding value for money. The camera is simple, ergonomically excellent, rugged and offers excellent IQ with notable high-ISO performance; I can routinely use at ISO 800 or above with minimal or no noise penalty. It's very nearly as good as my Z6. Excellent! This is all a result of not pimping the pixel count; 20MP is more than enough for the vast majority of shooting circumstances. The 16-50 is a little revelation - superb and consistent IQ in a ridiculously, tiny package; it's equivalent would be the 24-70 F4 Z Nikkor in Nikon Z FF and the 12-32 F3.5/5.6 in M4/3. I love it. The 50-250 is less startling, although it's still very compact for what it offers in range. I prefer a Nikkor 70-300 mm f/4.5-5.6E ED VR here, with FTZ adaptor - although it's bigger and more expensive, the IQ difference is notable, especially at the tele end of things. But don't get me wrong, the kit tele lens is still a little sweetie. So, what's not to like? In a word, lens selection and no IBIS. The two kit lenses are excellent and fulfill 95% of shooting situations. However, they're both slow and - even with effective in-lens IS - I miss the Z50s lack of IBIS. Plus the lens selection sucks right now. The two you get is all there is. Nothing fast, nothing wide and nothing more without the FTZ adaptor. A 10-20 equivalent, quality mid-range zoom and fast primes would kill on this body. So where are they, Nikon? Only a 18-140 travel zoom is on the road map, and that's simply not good enough. Please don't repeat the F-mount DX fiasco and take decades to produce a decent range of crop-frame glass! Pretty please? Oh, and you have to get 3rd party lens hoods; there's nothing in the kit. Boo. Addendum (1/10). I have subsequently done some more optical tests comparing the 50-250 DX Z and Nikkor 70-300E f/4.5-5.6E ED VR (FX). My conclusion is that the difference in image quality is not that great. The latter is bigger, heavier and more expensive, as well as adding an extra bit of reach. The kit lens holds its own over much of the shared range, although it's a tad slower, benefits from stopping down where possible, and isn't too convincing past 200mm. But it wins big-time or size, weight, portability and balance. Nice.

Good

Avevo preso una Panasonic G90, non mi aveva per niente convinto l’auto focus e forse fin troppi comandi nel menù. Ho optato quindi per questa Z50, soprattutto perché per le foto e la fotografia che piace a me, l’ho presa con incluso nel kit, con obiettivo 50-250 VR. Avevo paura che sarei incappato in problematiche analoghe, che in generale una mirrorless non mi avrebbe soddisfatto come la mia vecchia ma cara reflex Canon 600D Invece mi sono ricreduto, con questa Nikon, ho tutta la qualità che avevo con una reflex, mirino fantastico, ciò che fotografo è cio che vedo quindi resa fedelissima. Ho quindi a vantaggio un minor peso, caratteristiche più avanzate e rinnovate!! Sono rimasto felicissimo. Inoltre ho acquistato oltre gli obiettivi del kit, un 24mm fisso con apertura 1.7 e che dire….tutto eccezionale!!! Non ve ne pentirete per niente, l’ho preferita persino ad una Sony Alpha che non qualche sconto o meno il prezzo era simile. Ultima cosa, gli obiettivi e/o la messa a fuoco li ho trovati veloci e reattivi

Ürünle beraber objektifler gelmediği için değişim istedim. Değişimde de aynı şekilde geldi. İade talebi oluşturdum. Alacakların bilgisine