ClaycoForza Series Case for Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, Built-in Screen Protector Compatible with Fingerprint ID, Full-Body Rugged Cover, 6.9 inch, 2020 Release (Black)

I used to have a similar case withoit the screen protector which unfortunately broke on me. Ive only had this for a few weeks but so far it feels much sturdier and I like that it has an integrated screen protector. I was originally concerned since the images make it look like there's a hole in the screen protector that is not the case it is a different material that helps read your finger.Installation is pretty easy however you need to be careful with the finger scanner portion as any lint will be picked up if you aren't careful. I found out after trying to take off some dirt that made it to my initial install. The finger print scanner didn't work and I thought I would need to remove the screen protector entirely.Luckily wiping it down with an alcohol pad cleaned it up and I haven't had any issues since.Mine has had no issue with reading my finger even though I did not re-register my fingers, instructions suggest you should re-register after installing.One thing that may bug you that I've gotten used to is the finger print scan area is much more clear than the rest of the protector so you will see a difference in your screen in that area.

Very sturdy construction for full phone protection with extra padding on the corners. I switched to a new phone and my regular go-to for this type of phone case (the i-blason Ares) does not come with a screen protector for the Note 20 Ultra model.I searched around and found this case is a great substitute. I can safely report that the fingerprint scanner works well with this case with hardly any delay. You will need to apply a little more pressure when using the S-Pen but it's a minor inconvenience.The only quibble is the S-Pen is tricky to get out because of the extra corner protection but it's small price to pay.

As many say after spending $1300 on a phone having a serious case is the most important item on the shopping list. After serious research and few hours trying to watch videos and weighing the pros and cons of each case decided to buy 5 cases at one. Below the pros and cons of each and my preference.Before I go on it is important to explain that I have used front and back cases for many years . Prior years Otterbox was my preferred brand until I discovered Lifeproof. Unfortunately due to the fact that in 2020 Samsung decided to put fingerprint unlock in the front of the phones it seems the majority of cases for the S20, S20 ultra , Note 20 and Note 20 Ultra have no built-in-screen protection. DO NOT be fooled that Gorilla glass means your phone is safe. It is sturdier but for sure can scratch and break. Even if your phone has insurance and screen cost replacement is onl y $29 who wants to deal in the midst of a pandemic going to a store and who knows for how long deal without a phone. Here are my reviews:#1 SUPCASE UNICORN BETTLE PRO SERIESFor those who don’t mind not having a true built-in screen this case would be awesome.1. It has the holster and a sturdy kickstand that with creativity could be used as a ring holder to manage the weight and size of the phone. So the kickstand could help in that way too.2. This phone comes with a front protection besides the one in the back. But as the ad says the front cover has no real built in screen. I even think the front cover brings some mild protection. Not mayor one.3. The back protection looks pretty sturdy but no way in the world I would have felt safe if this phone falls towards the front part.4. Yes the back camera is protected making it sit lower than the back of the case5. The holster is awesome for those who ever use one. Of all the 3 cases without built-in-screen this would be most protective and functional one for my taste and needs.#2 SPIGEN TOUGH ARMOR1. This one has a very sturdy back protection and the yellow foam inside makes it feel sturdier to me than the Spigen Slim Armor with Credit card slot. Also, the back cover will not show much dust or traces of use. So that is cool2. I detested the kickstand. It seems so flimsy. That is why the instructions says if it comes off to attach it back. Definitely a no for me. No front protection at all and the kickstand is better on the above described Supcase Unicorn Beetle pro. Adios to this amigo forever.# 3 SPIGEN SLIM ARMOR CREDIT CARD SLOT1. I wanted to fall in love with this case due to the built in credit card slot. It also looks classy elegant but in the end this too is a no for me.2. This phone case like the other Spigen only comes with front back protection. I saw a video on you tube that swore these Spigen cases could be slammed and that back case was raised towards the front of the phone that the front would be safe. Not to my impression.I’m comfortable if this thing falls towards the front .The back protection of the Spigen Tough Armor is better. Only good thing this phone has is the credit card slot#4 SPIDERCASE WATERPROOF BUILT-IN-SCREEN PROTECTOR1. Have only tested this one day. This is more what I was looking for. This case protects the entire phone that is why they advertise this case is waterproof. I’m guessing this is why the case adds weight to the phone more than the others above (unless compared with the above Supcase while adding the extra layer of protection and using the holster clip). If adding weight via a case is a concern, then whole protection is not for you and for sure ditch this as an option. Naturally the back camera is also covered by a plastic to make it waterproof. Unlike other cases which have a raised bezel to protect the camera this one doesn’t. Id say it gives neutral protection to the camera against a 4 feet fall but whole protection against water2. Have not been able to make the fingerprint work which is crazy since the case comes with instructions on how to make it work and assures it will. Well I have not figured it then.3. This case is sturdy and since I’m liking it the most my next choice is to return it and hope to get one from this brand in which the fingerprint does works.4. Note the built-in-screen in the front and in the back will be easy to scratch. While it hasn’t happened yet with this case it happened plenty with my Lifeproof cases.5. I will be adding a credit card and ring holder to maneuver the weight.#5 CLAYCO FORZA SERIES1. Like the above Spire case this one has true built-in-screen protection. This is more my type of case. Was trying to decide if this one was better than the above and this Clayco is better than the Spidercase in the following ways:2. The 4 corners of the case are super raised with TPU so if the phone falls on any of those corners is way more protected than the corners of the Spidercase above.3. The back of the case is not entirely transparent which I don’t mind and it seems a lot sturdier than the Spidercase and for sure more scratch resistant.4. The camera in back has a higher bezel that will protect the camera a lot better/5. Only thing it doesn’t have is waterproof being a waterproof case. Therefore the back camera is open. It also feels lighter than the above Spidercase.6. The fingerprint DID work on this case. FOR JUST ONE DAY I did what the others review suggested which was erase all prior fingerprints and after putting this case set new fingerprints. For those who hasn’t worked just return and and request another one. IM RETURNING IT AND EXCHANGING IT FOR ANOTHER ONE HOPING THE FINGERPRINT WORKS LONGER. What a screw up from Samsung. The complaint threads are mayor and theyTo me these last 2 cases are the winners. Ill consider buying for this case a tempered glass for the camera and add a credit card and ring holder to make it easier to hold.IS THERE A CASE OUT THERE WITH BUILT-IN-SCREEN, CREDIT CARD SLOT AND RING HOLDER?

I have used this cover for about 3 years. I first used it on my Galaxy Note 8, and now on my Note 20 ultra. It does a great job of protecting my phone. After 3 years my Note 8 still look new. The screen protector will eventually get scratches, but it takes a lot of use and abuse. The one gripe I have, is on the Note20 model is the fingerprint scanner adhesive; it works good but not great, and if you take the case off you cannot replace the adhesive, so you have to buy a new case. I see it as a Samsung problem, they never should have left the fingerprint reader on the back of the phone.

I love the feel of it and you can tell that it protects the phone, but unfortunately, the fingertip scanner doesn't work...it keep asking to press harder...if I press it any harder than I already did, I will break the screen.

After about 30 minutes with this case, I can say I like it. So far it was an easy install and finger print sensor works very well. This case has nice padded, rounded corners and edges are very ergonomic. Touch screen is very clear, responsive and doesn't seem to smear too bad.As compared to the water proof Ghostek Nautical....a night and day difference. Not that the Nautical case is bad, it just isn't meant for an everyday user and is built for a different purpose. It is bulky, attracts oils, and finger print sensor barely works. But it is sturdy and supposed to be water tight.... although I never tested.This case is definitely a light weight case with good protection that I can see using for my daily use case. Not water tight by any means, but seems to be what I was lookung for in a Note 20 Ultra case.If things change I will update.